|
July 18, 2005
Arizona's state-run health insurance carrier for small
businesses is being accused of violating regulations
designed to avoid unfair competition with for-profit
carriers.
Some brokers say Healthcare Group, run by the Arizona
Health Care Cost Containment System, is telling small
businesses how to circumvent a clause implemented by
the Arizona Legislature two years ago.
That clause requires businesses to prove they have
gone without insurance for at least six months prior
to applying for the state-run program.
Brokers are saying Healthcare Group recently advised
businesses to get a new employer identification number,
or EIN, to skirt the 180-day period.
AHCCCS Director Tony Rogers said he is aware of the
complaint but believes it to be an isolated incident
and is investigating internally.
Healthcare Group has been known as the safety net for
small businesses that could not qualify for coverage
because of high health risks. But in the past few years,
it has more aggressively marketed affordable options
to all small businesses.
It's increased marketing efforts prompted the push
by commercial carriers in 2003 to lobby for the 180-day
"go-bare" period.
Sen. Dean Martin, R-Phoenix, chairman of the Senate
Finance Committee, said he has heard from several sources
about inappropriate solicitations by Healthcare Group
and wants to investigate whether this is an isolated
incident or a pattern.
"We would have very serious concerns whether they
would continue to go around a provision like this,"
Martin said.
Henry GrosJean, a Phoenix small business broker, had
been a long-time proponent of Healthcare Group but has
turned sour against the state-run plan as it has more
aggressively marketed to small businesses.
"They're making the product look like a commercial
product, and they're also encouraging employers to circumvent
the go-bare period," GrosJean said.
Bill Weaver, owner of Focus Benefits Group in Phoenix,
said he was in a Healthcare Group meeting with a client
at Paradise Valley Community College when sales staff
at Healthcare Group broached the idea to circumvent
the go-bare period by using a different EIN number.
"I know they have contacted this client several
times, encouraging him to take that action," Weaver
said. "They're out there running around trying
to get market share. ... They're going out there to
sell something."
AHCCCS' Rogers said he questioned the sales staff after
hearing the allegations and ordered employees to call
brokers working with Healthcare Group to determine who
is promoting the idea.
"We wanted to check with our brokers to see if
there has been any inappropriate communication between
sales staff and brokers," Rogers said.
He said so far he has not heard from anyone in the
brokerage community who was approached with this sales
pitch.
"We have one person who said at one meeting there
was a discussion about EIN," Rogers said. "We're
still trying to figure out whether this is an isolated
event. We're not finding any pattern that this has been
going on."
Rogers said Healthcare Group made a commitment two
years ago to honor the go-bare period. There are enough
small businesses out there without health insurance
that Healthcare Group needs to be targeting, he said.
"That's where our focus has been. To take business
away from the commercial health plans is counterproductive.
It doesn't really reduce the number of uninsured."
Commercial carriers hope Healthcare Group takes the
high road.
"We have heard those rumors as well, but we assume
they are going to comply with the law in good faith,"
said Regena Frieden, public relations manager for Blue
Cross Blue Shield of Arizona.
As if an investigation into Healthcare Group isn't
enough for the agency to deal with, Martin dropped another
bomb suggesting Healthcare Group be spun off so that
it's no longer run by a state agency, much the way the
State Compensation Fund is considered a separate entity.
"My biggest concern with having Healthcare Group
as an insurer run by a state agency is: What keeps the
Legislature, or anybody else for that matter, from raiding
their reserves the next time we go into a recession?"
Martin asked.
|